Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added a method right next to glitch-soc-only methods.
Added upstream's method.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Upstream changed a line right next to a glitch-soc addition.
Changed the code as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/settings/preferences/other/show.html.haml`:
Upstream moved some preferences to a new category, while glitch-soc had an
extra preference there.
Moved the extra preference like upstream did to the new category.
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Conflict because upstream added context extensions where glitch-soc had its own.
Added upstream's new context extension while keeping ours.
Conflicts:
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
Upstream changed the file, while we had a different one.
Updated the common parts.
- `README.md`:
Upstream changed the file, while we had a different one.
Updated the common parts.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Upstream added helpers where glitch-soc had extra ones.
Added upstream's new helpers.
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
Upstream added some custom handling of one setting, while
glitch-soc had additional code.
Ported upstream's code.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Upstream moved some things to `config/mastodon.yml`.
Did the same.
- `spec/requests/api/v1/accounts/credentials_spec.rb`:
I don't know honestly.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/concerns/user/has_settings.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a setting textually close to a glitch-soc one.
Added upstream's new setting.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a setting textually close to a glitch-soc one.
Added upstream's new setting.
- `config/routes.rb`:
Upstream moved web app routes to `config/routes/web_app.rb`, while glitch-soc had
an extra route.
Moved the extra route to `config/routes/web_app.rb`.
- `spec/controllers/settings/preferences/appearance_controller_spec.rb`:
This spec got converted to a system spec upstream.
However, the theme setting works differently in glitch-soc, so the spec had been
changed.
Changed the corresponding system spec as well.
Conflicts:
- `.env.production.sample`:
Upstream added a block of three environment variables, while glitch-soc
has a different version of the file overall.
Added upstream's changes.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Upstream added a helper, while glitch-soc had extra helpers.
Added upstream's helper.
Conflicts:
- `spec/lib/sanitize/config_spec.rb`:
Upstream rewrote top-level `describe` calls to `RSpec.describe`, and
glitch-soc had differences in the first few tests because of the wider
subset of HTML it accepts.
Changed `describe` to `RSpec.describe` as upstream did, keeping
glitch-soc's tests.
Conflicts:
- `db/migrate/20180831171112_create_bookmarks.rb`:
Upstream ran a lint fix on this file, but this file is different in
glitch-soc because the feature was added much earlier.
Ran the lint fix on our own version of the file.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/user_settings.rb`:
Upstream added a constraint on a setting textually close
to glitch-soc-only settings.
Applied upstream's change.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for the `translate` attribute on a few elements,
where glitch-soc had a different set of allowed elements and attributes.
Extended glitch-soc's allowed attributes with `translate` as upstream did.
- `spec/validators/status_length_validator_spec.rb`:
Upstream refactored to use RSpec's `instance_double` instead of `double`,
but glitch-soc had changes to tests due to configurable max toot chars.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping tests against configurable max
toot chars.
